4.6 Article

Energy saving, indoor thermal comfort and indoor air quality evaluation of an office environment using corner impinging jet ventilation

Journal

DEVELOPMENTS IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100179

Keywords

Corner impinging jet ventilation; Computational fluid dynamic; Thermal comfort; Indoor air quality; Energy saving

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performance of a corner based impinging jet ventilation system (CIJV) in an office environment was numerically evaluated, considering both local thermal comfort and indoor air quality. The results showed that CIJV outperforms a traditional mixing system in terms of indoor air quality. It was also found that CIJV creates a stronger temperature stratification in summertime compared to wintertime. The energy saving potential of CIJV was assessed, and a possible reduction of 7%, 8%, and 9% in ventilation flowrate was observed for different outdoor temperature ranges.
The performance of a corner based impinging jet ventilation system (CIJV) in an office environment was evaluated numerically. The evaluation was done both in terms of the local thermal comfort and the local indoor air quality. Three different inlet configurations were tested for a range of outdoor temperatures that included both winter and summer conditions. In terms of indoor air quality, the results showed that CIJV performed better than a traditional mixing system. The study also revealed that CIJV creates a stronger temperature stratification in summertime compared to wintertime. When evaluating the energy saving potential the results showed a possible reduction of 7% for the ventilation flowrate when the outdoor temperatures were between -15 & DEG;C and -5 & DEG;C, 8% when the outdoor temperatures were between 0 & DEG;C and 10 & DEG;C and 9% when the outdoor temperatures were between 15 & DEG;C and 25 & DEG;C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available