4.6 Article

Quality II: A new paradigm for construction

Journal

DEVELOPMENTS IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100261

Keywords

Construction; Errors; Paradigm; Quality; Performance; Productivity; Rework; Safety

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a new paradigm, Quality II, for managing and learning how to handle errors in construction. By incorporating emerging best practices in construction and contemporary safety developments, the Quality II paradigm effectively reduces rework and improves project performance and profitability for construction organizations.
The Quality I paradigm utilizes an error prevention strategy to avert rework in construction. The effectiveness of this paradigm is questionable as rework has become an innate feature of practice. If rework is to be mitigated in construction projects, a new paradigm is needed to challenge conventional thinking and offer a different perspective on managing errors. We introduce a new paradigm, Quality II, by drawing on a narrative review, emerging best practices deployed in construction, and contemporary developments in safety (e.g., Safety II and III). The implications of a Quality II paradigm for theory development and practice are also examined. The contributions of this paper are twofold as we: (1) provide construction organizations with a new approach for managing and learning how to handle (i.e., learning through) errors, and thus provide them with the ability to adapt and respond to varying conditions effectively; and (2) align Quality II with contemporary safety paradigms to offset competing demands enabling construction organizations to maximize the use of their limited resources better. By curbing rework, the performance and productivity of projects and the profitability of construction organizations will improve.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available