4.8 Article

Randomized Trial of Thymectomy in Myasthenia Gravis

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 375, Issue 6, Pages 511-522

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602489

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H03084] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Thymectomy has been a mainstay in the treatment of myasthenia gravis, but there is no conclusive evidence of its benefit. We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial comparing thymectomy plus prednisone with prednisone alone. METHODS We compared extended transsternal thymectomy plus alternate-day prednisone with alternate-day prednisone alone. Patients 18 to 65 years of age who had generalized nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis with a disease duration of less than 5 years were included if they had Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America clinical class II to IV disease (on a scale from I to V, with higher classes indicating more severe disease) and elevated circulating concentrations of acetylcholine-receptor antibody. The primary outcomes were the time-weighted average Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (on a scale from 0 to 39, with higher scores indicating more severe disease) over a 3-year period, as assessed by means of blinded rating, and the time-weighted average required dose of prednisone over a 3-year period. RESULTS A total of 126 patients underwent randomization between 2006 and 2012 at 36 sites. Patients who underwent thymectomy had a lower time-weighted average Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score over a 3-year period than those who received prednisone alone (6.15 vs. 8.99, P < 0.001); patients in the thymectomy group also had a lower average requirement for alternate-day prednisone (44 mg vs. 60 mg, P < 0.001). Fewer patients in the thymectomy group than in the prednisone-only group required immunosuppression with azathioprine (17% vs. 48%, P < 0.001) or were hospitalized for exacerbations (9% vs. 37%, P < 0.001). The number of patients with treatment-associated complications did not differ significantly between groups (P = 0.73), but patients in the thymectomy group had fewer treatment-associated symptoms related to immunosuppressive medications (P < 0.001) and lower distress levels related to symptoms (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Thymectomy improved clinical outcomes over a 3-year period in patients with nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and others; MGTX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00294658.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available