4.6 Article

High-dimensional profiling of pediatric immune responses to solid organ transplantation

Journal

CELL REPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 4, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101147

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solid organ transplant is a life-saving therapy for children with end-stage organ diseases, but a significant proportion of recipients experience acute rejection. This study analyzed the immune composition of pediatric solid organ transplant recipients using high-dimensional mass cytometry, and found that the type of organ transplant strongly influences the post-transplant immune profile. Changes in the proportion of different T cell subpopulations are associated with graft health. These findings provide a basis for further understanding and developing new immunosuppressive agents.
Solid organ transplant remains a life-saving therapy for children with end-stage heart, lung, liver, or kidney disease; however,-33% of allograft recipients experience acute rejection within the first year after trans-plant. Our ability to detect early rejection is hampered by an incomplete understanding of the immune changes associated with allograft health, particularly in the pediatric population. We performed detailed, multilineage, single-cell analysis of the peripheral blood immune composition in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients, with high-dimensional mass cytometry. Supervised and unsupervised analysis methods to study cell-type proportions indicate that the allograft type strongly influences the post-transplant immune profile. Further, when organ-specific differences are considered, graft health is associated with changes in the proportion of distinct T cell subpopulations. Together, these data form the basis for mechanistic studies into the pathobiology of rejection and allow for the development of new immunosuppressive agents with greater specificity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available