4.6 Article

The Effect of Lumbar Spinal Muscle on Spinal Sagittal Alignment: Evaluating Muscle Quantity and Quality

Journal

NEUROSURGERY
Volume 79, Issue 6, Pages 847-855

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001269

Keywords

Fatty degeneration; Lumbar spinal muscle; MRI; Sagittal parameters; Spinal sagittal balance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: The majority of earlier studies of the parameters of sagittal balance did not consider the influence of spinal muscles on spinal sagittal alignment. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relationship between the paraspinal muscle (quantity and quality) and sagittal alignment in elderly patients. METHODS: We reviewed 50 full-spine lateral standing radiographs and lumbar magnetic resonance images of elderly patients at a single center. The radiographic parameters examined were thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and pelvic incidence (PI). The lumbar muscularity (LM; quantity) and fatty degeneration ratio (FD; quality) in the paraspinal muscle were measured at the L3 level on magnetic resonance images. The relationships between the parameters, LM, and FD were analyzed with the Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple linear regression. RESULTS: Pearson analysis demonstrated that the FD had significant correlations with age (r = 0.393), thoracic kyphosis (r = -0.559), pelvic tilt (r = 0.430), sagittal vertical axis (r = 0.488), and PI - LL (r = 0.479, P < .05), and a close negative correlation was found between the FD and LL (r = -0.505, P < .01). The LM had significant correlations with the LL (r = 0.342) and PI - LL (r = -0.283, P < .05). Regression models that controlled for confounding factors such as body mass index confirmed the correlations between the above parameters and FD (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The quality of the paraspinal muscle could be one of the various factors that influence sagittal balance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available