4.6 Article

Indentation and Detachment in Adhesive Contacts between Soft Elastomer and Rigid Indenter at Simultaneous Motion in Normal and Tangential Direction: Experiments and Simulations

Journal

BIOMIMETICS
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics8060477

Keywords

adhesion; simultaneous normal and tangential contact; elastomer; friction; adhesive strength; work of adhesion; experiment; simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the process of indentation and detachment of a steel indenter in a soft elastomer layer under different inclination angles. Experimental and theoretical analysis reveals the differences in characteristics between small indentation angles and angles close to the normal angle.
In reported experiments, a steel indenter was pressed into a soft elastomer layer under varying inclination angles and subsequently was detached under various inclination angles too. The processes of indentation and detachment were recorded with a video camera, and the time dependences of the normal and tangential components of the contact force and the contact area, as well as the average contact pressure and average tangential stresses, were measured as functions of the inclination angle. Based on experimental results, a simple theoretical model of the indentation process is proposed, in which tangential and normal contacts are considered independently. Both experimental and theoretical results show that at small indentation angles (when the direction of motion is close to tangential), a mode with elastomer slippage relative to the indenter is observed, which leads to complex dynamic processes-the rearrangement of the contact boundary and the propagation of elastic waves (similar to Schallamach waves). If the angle is close to the normal angle, there is no slipping in the contact plane during the entire indentation (detachment) phase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available