Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Measuring Spatial Perspective Taking: Analysis of Four Measures Using Item Response Theory
Maria Brucato et al.
TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE (2023)
The role of a graphical interpretation factor in the assessment of Spatial Visualization: A critical analysis
Kristin A. Bartlett et al.
SPATIAL COGNITION AND COMPUTATION (2023)
Gender Differences in Spatial Ability: a Critical Review
Kristin A. Bartlett et al.
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW (2023)
Incremental Model Fit Assessment in the Case of Categorical Data: Tucker-Lewis Index for Item Response Theory Modeling
Li Cai et al.
PREVENTION SCIENCE (2023)
Evidence for a unitary structure of spatial cognition beyond general intelligence
Margherita Malanchini et al.
NPJ SCIENCE OF LEARNING (2020)
Tapped out or barely tapped? Recommendations for how to harness the vast and largely unused potential of the Mechanical Turk participant pool
Jonathan Robinson et al.
PLOS ONE (2019)
Psychological Science Needs a Standard Practice of Reporting the Reliability of Cognitive-Behavioral Measurements
Sam Parsons et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2019)
A Diagnostic Procedure to Detect Departures From Local Independence in Item Response Theory Models
Michael C. Edwards et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2018)
Ability and sex differences in spatial thinking: What does the mental rotation test really measure?
Mary Hegarty
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2018)
Improving spatial thinking skills among undergraduate geology students through short online training exercises
Anne U. Gold et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION (2018)
The Pitfall of Experimenting on the Web: How Unattended Selective Attrition Leads to Surprising (Yet False) Research Conclusions
Haotian Zhou et al.
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2016)
mirt: A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for theREnvironment
R. Philip Chalmers
Journal of Statistical Software (2015)
The international cognitive ability resource: Development and initial validation of a public-domain measure
David M. Condon et al.
INTELLIGENCE (2014)
The Malleability of Spatial Skills: A Meta-Analysis of Training Studies
David H. Uttal et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN (2013)
Seriousness checks are useful to improve data validity in online research
Frederik Aust et al.
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS (2013)
Twisting space: are rigid and non-rigid mental transformations separate spatial skills?
Kinnari Atit et al.
COGNITIVE PROCESSING (2013)
Inferring cross sections of 3D objects: A new spatial thinking test
Cheryl A. Cohen et al.
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES (2012)
Improving ability measurement in surveys by following the principles of IRT: The Wordsum vocabulary test in the General Social Survey
M. Ken Cor et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH (2012)
Types of reasoning in 3D geometry thinking and their relation with spatial ability
Marios Pittalis et al.
EDUCATIONAL STUDIES IN MATHEMATICS (2010)
Spatial Ability for STEM Domains: Aligning Over 50 Years of Cumulative Psychological Knowledge Solidifies Its Importance
Jonathan Wai et al.
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY (2009)
How spatial abilities enhance, and are enhanced by, dental education
Mary Hegarty et al.
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES (2009)
lIndividual differences in use of external visualisations to perform an internal visualisation task
Cheryl A. Cohen et al.
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY (2007)
Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study
DL Shea et al.
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY (2001)