4.7 Review

A review of vulnerability and risks for schizophrenia: Beyond the two hit hypothesis

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 65, Issue -, Pages 185-194

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.017

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH
  2. Simons Autism Foundation
  3. Cancer Council of Victoria
  4. CRC for Mental Health
  5. Stanley Medical Research Foundation
  6. MBF
  7. NHMRC
  8. Beyond Blue
  9. Geelong Medical Research Foundation
  10. Bristol Myers Squibb
  11. Eli Lilly
  12. GlaxoSmithKline
  13. Organon
  14. Novartis
  15. Mayne Pharma
  16. Servier
  17. Brain and Behaviour Research Institute
  18. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
  19. Australian Rotary Health
  20. Ian Potter Foundation
  21. Meat and Livestock Board
  22. University of Melbourne
  23. Stanley Medical Research Institute
  24. ARHRF
  25. Simons Foundation
  26. Fondation FondaMental
  27. NIMH [MH099431]
  28. Brain and Behavior Foundation
  29. Marion
  30. EH Flack Trust
  31. Deakin University
  32. Brazillian Society Mobility Program Lilly
  33. ASBD/Servier Grant
  34. John Cade Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council [APP1056929]
  35. NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship [628386]
  36. Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (NARSAD) Distinguished Investigator Award (US) [18722]
  37. Janssen Cilag
  38. BMS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Schizophrenia risk has often been conceptualized using a model which requires two hits in order to generate the clinical phenotype the first as an early priming in a genetically predisposed individual and the second a likely environmental insult. The aim of this paper was to review the literature and reformulate this binary risk-vulnerability model. We sourced the data for this narrative review from the electronic database PUBMED. Our search terms were not limited by language or date of publication. The development of schizophrenia may be driven by genetic vulnerability interacting with multiple vulnerability factors including lowered prenatal vitamin D exposure, viral infections, smoking intelligence quotient, social cognition cannabis use, social defeat, nutrition and childhood trauma. It is likely that these genetic risks, environmental risks and vulnerability factors are cumulative and interactive with each other and with critical periods of neurodevelopmental vulnerability. The development of schizophrenia is likely to be more complex and nuanced than the binary two hit model originally proposed nearly thirty years ago. Risk appears influenced by a more complex process involving genetic risk interfacing with multiple potentially interacting hits and vulnerability factors occurring at key periods of neurodevelopmental activity, which culminate in the expression of disease state. These risks are common across a number of neuropsychiatric and medical disorders, which might inform common preventive and intervention strategies across non-communicable disorders. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available