4.7 Review

The water maze paradigm in experimental studies of chronic cognitive disorders: Theory, protocols, analysis, and inference

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages 195-217

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.016

Keywords

Cognitive neuroscience; Spatial learning and memory; Water maze; Video tracking; Multivariate analysis; Disease models

Funding

  1. Ontario Mental Health Foundation
  2. Father Sean O'sullivan Research Foundation (St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton)
  3. Ontario Graduate Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An instrumental step in assessing the validity of animal models of chronic cognitive disorders is to document disease-related deficits in learning/memory capacity. The water maze (WM) is a popular paradigm because of its low cost, relatively simple protocol and short procedure time. Despite being broadly accepted as a spatial learning task, inference of generalized, bona fide cognitive dysfunction can be challenging because task accomplishment is also reliant on non-cognitive processes. We review theoretical background, testing procedures, confounding factors, as well as approaches to data analysis and interpretation. We also describe an extended protocol that has proven useful in detecting early performance deficits in murine models of neuropsychiatric lupus and Alzheimer's disease. Lastly, we highlight the need for standardization of inferential criteria on cognitive dysfunction in experimental rodents and exclusion of preparations of a limited scientific merit. A deeper appreciation for the multifactorial nature of performance in WM may also help to reveal other deficits that herald the onset of neurodegenerative brain disorders. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available