4.5 Article

An Analytic Method to Determine the Optimal Time for the Induction Phase of Anesthesia

Journal

AXIOMS
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/axioms12090867

Keywords

pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model; optimal control theory; time-optimal control of the induction phase of anesthesia; shooting method; analytical method; numerical simulations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, an analytical solution for the time-optimal control problem in the induction phase of anesthesia is obtained and compared with the conventional shooting method. The results show that the proposed analytical method aligns numerically with the shooting method. This method has advantages in solving the minimum-time problem in the induction phase of anesthesia.
We obtain an analytical solution for the time-optimal control problem in the induction phase of anesthesia. Our solution is shown to align numerically with the results obtained from the conventional shooting method. The induction phase of anesthesia relies on a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model proposed by Bailey and Haddad in 2005 to regulate the infusion of propofol. In order to evaluate our approach and compare it with existing results in the literature, we examine a minimum-time problem for anesthetizing a patient. By applying the Pontryagin minimum principle, we introduce the shooting method as a means to solve the problem at hand. Additionally, we conducted numerical simulations using the MATLAB computing environment. We solve the time-optimal control problem using our newly proposed analytical method and discover that the optimal continuous infusion rate of the anesthetic and the minimum required time for transition from the awake state to an anesthetized state exhibit similarity between the two methods. However, the advantage of our new analytic method lies in its independence from unknown initial conditions for the adjoint variables.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available