Journal
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
Volume 93, Issue -, Pages 501-512Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.03.023
Keywords
Apraxia; Gesture; Planning; Parietal cortex; Tool use; Lefthanders; Right-handers; Praxis; Motor dominance; Dissociable mechanisms
Funding
- NIH/NINDS [NS053962]
- Brain, Biology and Machine Initiative (BBMI) Research Fellowship - TATRC grant in the Department of Psychology at the University of Oregon [01-05]
- grant Maestro from National Science Center (Narodowe Centrum Nauki, NCN, Poland) [2011/02/A/HS6/00174]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Data from focal brain injury and functional neuroimaging studies implicate a distributed network of parieto-fronto-temporal areas in the human left cerebral hemisphere as playing distinct roles in the representation of meaningful actions (praxis). Because these data come primarily from right-handed individuals, the relationship between left cerebral specialization for praxis representation and hand dominance remains unclear. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to evaluate the hypothesis that strongly left-handed (right hemisphere motor dominant) adults also exhibit this left cerebral specialization. Participants planned familiar actions for subsequent performance with the left or right hand in response to transitive (e.g., pounding) or intransitive (e.g. waving) action words. In linguistic control trials, cues denoted non-physical actions (e.g., believing). Action planning was associated with significant, exclusively left-lateralized and extensive increases of activity in the supramarginal gyrus (SMg), and more focal modulations in the left caudal middle temporal gyrus (cMTg). This activity was hand- and gesture-independent, i.e., unaffected by the hand involved in subsequent action performance, and the type of gesture (i.e., transitive or intransitive). Compared directly with right-handers, left-handers exhibited greater involvement of the right angular gyrus (ANg) and dorsal pre-motor cortex (dPMC), which is indicative of a less asymmetric functional architecture for praxis representation. We therefore conclude that the organization of mechanisms involved in planning familiar actions is influenced by one's motor dominance. However, independent of hand dominance, the left SMg and cMTg are specialized for ideomotor transformations the integration of conceptual knowledge and motor representations into meaningful actions. These findings support the view that higher-order praxis representation and lower-level motor dominance rely on dissociable mechanisms. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available