Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Surgical Delay of Nipple Areola Complex: A Powerful Technique to Extend the Indication of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
Andrea Loreti et al.
CLINICAL BREAST CANCER (2023)
Quality of online information about migraine headache surgery
Jacopo Maria Frattaroli et al.
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY (2022)
History of breast implants: Back to the future
Fabio Santanelli di Pompeo et al.
JPRAS OPEN (2022)
What Does Dr. Google Show Patients Searching for Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Photographs?
Krista M. Nicklaus et al.
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN (2022)
Simulating language knowledge across the EU: language regimes, language learning and consequences for linguistic disenfranchisement
Marco Civico
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCE (2022)
What Does Dr. Google Show Patients Searching for Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Photographs?
Krista M. Nicklaus et al.
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN (2022)
Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction
Shayda J. Mirhaidari et al.
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY (2020)
Immediate Breast Reconstruction after mastectomy with polyurethane implants versus textured implants: A retrospective study with focus on capsular contracture
Andrea Loreti et al.
BREAST (2020)
The New Trend of Pre-pectoral Breast Reconstruction: An Objective Evaluation of the Quality of Online Information for Patients Undergoing Breast Reconstruction
M. Marcasciano et al.
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY (2019)
An overview of animation deformity in prosthetic breast reconstruction
Megan Fracol et al.
GLAND SURGERY (2019)
Nipple-sparing bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with TiLoop® Bra mesh in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: A prospective study of long-term and patient reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q
D. Casella et al.
BREAST (2018)
Quality of online information on breast cancer treatment options
Nadia Arif et al.
BREAST (2018)
Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Tissue Expander Placement: A Clinical and Quality of Life Outcomes Study
Gurjot S. Walia et al.
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN (2018)
Polyurethane Implants in 2-Stage Breast Reconstruction: 9-Year Clinical Experience
Stefano Pompei et al.
AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL (2017)
The Economics of Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
Scot Bradley Glasberg
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY (2017)
Patients' satisfaction with anatomic polyurethane implants
Guillermo Vazquez
GLAND SURGERY (2017)
Breast reconstruction post mastectomy-Let's Google it. Accessibility, readability and quality of online information
Noel P. Lynch et al.
BREAST (2017)
Quality of information for women seeking breast augmentation in the Internet
Adrian Fernando Palma et al.
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY (2016)
Subcutaneous Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Surgical, Functional, and Aesthetic Results after Long-Term Follow-Up
Marco Bernini et al.
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN (2015)
Breast Cancer Statistics, 2013
Carol DeSantis et al.
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS (2014)
A Paradigm Shift in US Breast Reconstruction: Increasing Implant Rates
Claudia R. Albornoz et al.
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY (2013)
Outcome Assessment of Breast Distortion Following Submuscular Breast Augmentation
Scott L. Spear et al.
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY (2009)
Measuring quality of patient information documents with an expanded EQIP scale
A. I. Charvet-Berard et al.
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING (2008)
Ensuring Quality Information for Patients: development and preliminary validation of a new instrument to improve the quality of written health care information
B Moult et al.
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS (2004)
How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web?: Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews
G Eysenbach et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2002)
Share Paper
