4.8 Review

Nanoparticle colloidal stability in cell culture media and impact on cellular interactions

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 44, Issue 17, Pages 6287-6305

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4cs00487f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP00P2126483/1, 133597]
  2. Adolphe Merkle Foundation
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation through the National Centre of Competence in Research Bio-Inspired Materials
  4. L'Oreal Switzerland
  5. UNESCO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanomaterials are finding increasing use for biomedical applications such as imaging, diagnostics, and drug delivery. While it is well understood that nanoparticle (NP) physico-chemical properties can dictate biological responses and interactions, it has been difficult to outline a unifying framework to directly link NP properties to expected in vitro and in vivo outcomes. When introduced to complex biological media containing electrolytes, proteins, lipids, etc., nanoparticles (NPs) are subjected to a range of forces which determine their behavior in this environment. One aspect of NP behavior in biological systems that is often understated or overlooked is aggregation. NP aggregation will significantly alter in vitro behavior (dosimetry, NP uptake, cytotoxicity), as well as in vivo fate (pharmacokinetics, toxicity, biodistribution). Thus, understanding the factors driving NP colloidal stability and aggregation is paramount. Furthermore, studying biological interactions with NPs at the nanoscale level requires an interdisciplinary effort with a robust understanding of multiple characterization techniques. This review examines the factors that determine NP colloidal stability, the various efforts to stabilize NP in biological media, the methods to characterize NP colloidal stability in situ, and provides a discussion regarding NP interactions with cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available