4.7 Article

BONLAC: A combinatorial proteomic technique to measure stimulus-induced translational profiles in brain slices

Journal

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 100, Issue -, Pages 76-89

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.07.017

Keywords

BONLAC; BONCAT; SILAC; de nova proteomics; BDNF; hippocampal slice; synaptic plasticity; protein synthesis

Funding

  1. NIH [T32 MH019524, NS034007, NS047384, NS21072, HD23315, NS050276, RR027990, GM113237]
  2. Simons Foundation [274864]
  3. NSF [CHE-1152317]
  4. FRAXA Research Foundation
  5. Charles H. Revson Senior Fellowship in Biomedical Science
  6. Division Of Chemistry
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1152317] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stimulus-triggered protein synthesis is critical for brain health and function. However, due to technical hurdles, de novo neuronal translation is predominantly studied in cultured cells, whereas electrophysiological and circuit analyses often are performed in brain slices. The different properties of these two experimental systems create an information gap about stimulus-induced alterations in the expression of new proteins in mature circuits. To address this, we adapted two existing techniques, BONCAT and SILAC, to a combined proteomic technique, BONLAC, for use in acute adult hippocampal slices. Using BDNF-induced protein synthesis as a proof of concept, we found alterations in expression of proteins involved in neurotransmission, trafficking, and cation binding that differed from those found in a similar screen in cultured neurons. Our results indicate important differences between cultured neurons and slices, and suggest that BONLAC could be used to dissect proteomic changes underlying synaptic events in adult circuits. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Synaptopathy - from Biology to Therapy'. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available