4.8 Review

Upconverting nanoparticles: assessing the toxicity

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 1561-1584

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4cs00177j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wroclaw Research Centre EIT + within the project The Application of Nanotechnology in Advanced Materials - NanoMat - European Regional Development Fund (Operational Programme Innovative Economy) [POIG.01.01.02-02-002/08, 1.1.2]
  2. Narodowe Centrum Nauki, Poland [DEC-2012/05/E/ST5/03901]
  3. Concordia University Research Chair in Nanoscience
  4. Concordia University
  5. NSERC, Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lanthanide doped nanoparticles (Ln: NPs) hold promise as novel luminescent probes for numerous applications in nanobiophotonics. Despite excellent photostability, narrowband photoluminescence, efficient anti-Stokes emission and long luminescence lifetimes, which are needed to meet the requirements of multiplexed and background free detection at prolonged observation times, concern about their toxicity is still an issue for both in vivo and in vitro applications. Similar to other chemicals or pharmaceuticals, the very same properties that are desirable and potentially useful from a biomedical perspective can also give rise to unexpected and hazardous toxicities. In engineered bionanomaterials, the potentially harmful effects may originate not only from their chemical composition but also from their small size. The latter property enables the nanoparticles to bypass the biological barriers, thus allowing deep tissue penetration and the accumulation of the nanoparticles in a number of organs. In addition, nanoparticles are known to possess high surface chemical reactivity as well as a large surface-to-volume ratio, which may seriously affect their biocompatibility. Herein we survey the underlying mechanisms of nanotoxicity and provide an overview on the nanotoxicity of lanthanides and of upconverting nanoparticles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available