4.8 Review

Lanthanide-doped upconversion nano-bioprobes: electronic structures, optical properties, and biodetection

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 1379-1415

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4cs00178h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. 973 program of MOST of China [2014CB845605]
  2. Special Project of National Major Scientific Equipment Development of China [2012YQ120060]
  3. NSFC [11104266, 11204302, 11304314, U1305244, 21325104]
  4. CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams
  5. Strategic Priority Research Program and Scientific Equipment Development Project of the CAS [XDA09030307, YZ201210]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) have attracted considerable interest due to their superior physicochemical features, such as large anti-Stokes shifts, low autofluorescence background, low toxicity and high penetration depth, which make them extremely suitable for use as alternatives to conventional downshifting luminescence bioprobes like organic dyes and quantum dots for various biological applications. A fundamental understanding of the photophysics of lanthanide-doped UCNPs is of vital importance for discovering novel optical properties and exploring their new applications. In this review, we focus on the most recent advances in the development of lanthanide-doped UCNPs as potential luminescent nano-bioprobes by means of our customized lanthanide photophysics measurement platforms specially designed for upconversion luminescence, which covers from their fundamental photophysics to bioapplications, including electronic structures (energy levels and local site symmetry of emitters), excited-state dynamics, optical property designing, and their promising applications for in vitro biodetection of tumor markers. Some future prospects and efforts towards this rapidly growing field are also envisioned.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available