4.8 Article

Distinct Structural Pathways Coordinate the Activation of AMPA Receptor-Auxiliary Subunit Complexes

Journal

NEURON
Volume 89, Issue 6, Pages 1264-1276

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.038

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [FRN: 82804]
  2. Leverhulme Trust [RPG-059]
  3. Medical Research Council [MR/M0004331]
  4. Canada Graduate Scholarship (CGS-D) from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  5. Alfred Benzon Foundation
  6. EPSRC [EP/L000253/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. MRC [MR/M000435/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L000253/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Medical Research Council [MR/M000435/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neurotransmitter-gated ion channels adopt different gating modes to fine-tune signaling at central synapses. At glutamatergic synapses, high and low activity of AMPA receptors (AMPARs) is observed when pore-forming subunits coassemble with or without auxiliary subunits, respectively. Whether a common structural pathway accounts for these different gating modes is unclear. Here, we identify two structural motifs that determine the time course of AMPAR channel activation. A network of electrostatic interactions at the apex of the AMPAR ligand-binding domain (LBD) is essential for gating by pore-forming subunits, whereas a conserved motif on the lower, D2 lobe of the LBD prolongs channel activity when auxiliary subunits are present. Accordingly, channel activity is almost entirely abolished by elimination of the electrostatic network but restored via auxiliary protein interactions at the D2 lobe. In summary, we propose that activation of native AMPAR complexes is coordinated by distinct structural pathways, favored by the association/dissociation of auxiliary subunits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available