4.8 Review

Specific light-up bioprobes based on AIEgen conjugates

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 44, Issue 10, Pages 2798-2811

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4cs00444b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Defence [R279-000-340-232]
  2. SMART [R279-000-378-592]
  3. National University of Singapore [R279-000-415-112]
  4. A-Star Joint Council Office [IMRE/14-8P1110]
  5. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [HKUST2/CRF/10]
  6. Ministry of Science and Technology of China (973 program) [2013CB834701]
  7. Guangdong Innovative Research Team Program [201101C0105067115]
  8. Singapore NRF Investigatorship [IMRE/14-8P1110]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Driven by the high demand for sensitive and specific tools for optical sensing and imaging, bioprobes with various working mechanisms and advanced functionalities are flourishing at an incredible speed. Conventional fluorescent probes suffer from the notorious effect of aggregation-caused quenching that imposes limitation on their labelling efficiency or concentration to achieve desired sensitivity. The recently emerged fluorogens with an aggregation-induced emission (AIE) feature offer a timely remedy to tackle the challenge. Utilizing the unique properties of AIE fluorogens (AIEgens), specific light-up probes have been constructed through functionalization with recognition elements, showing advantages such as low background interference, a high signal to noise ratio and superior photostability with activatable therapeutic effects. In this tutorial review, we summarize the recent progress in the development of specific AIEgen-based light-up bioprobes. Through illustration of their operation mechanisms and application examples, we hope to provide guidelines for the design of more advanced AIE sensing and imaging platforms with high selectivity, great sensitivity and wide adaptability to a broad range of biomedical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available