3.8 Article

Recurrent facial baroparesis on airplane flights relieved by endoscopic sinus surgery: A case report

Journal

ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA CASE REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 100-103

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23772484.2023.2228484

Keywords

Facial baroparesis; eustachian tube dysfunction; dehiscence; altitude change; endoscopic sinus surgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Facial baroparesis, a rare condition caused by compression of the facial nerve, can be relieved by endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). We report the case of a 41-year-old man who experienced recurrent facial palsy during altitude changes in an aircraft. CT scan revealed dehiscence of the tympanic portion of the facial nerve canal, leading to the diagnosis of facial baroparesis. After undergoing ESS, the patient has been free of facial palsy during airplane altitude changes for 4 years. This is the first reported case of facial baroparesis relieved by ESS.
Facial baroparesis is a rare transient facial nerve palsy caused by compression of the tympanic segment of the facial nerve. However, otolaryngologists are lacking sufficient information about the course and treatment of this disease. We report a case of facial baroparesis relieved by endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). A 41-year-old man presented with a one-year history of recurrent right facial palsy that only developed during altitude changes in an aircraft. Computed tomography (CT) of the temporal bone revealed dehiscence of the tympanic portion of the facial nerve canal. Based on the CT finding and clinical course, the patient was diagnosed with facial baroparesis. He was also diagnosed with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), and thereafter underwent ESS. For 4 years after surgery, he has not experienced facial palsy during airplane altitude changes. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of facial baroparesis relieved by ESS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available