3.8 Article

Quantity expressions in the Gumer variety of Gurage

Journal

COGENT ARTS & HUMANITIES
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/23311983.2023.2229086

Keywords

Gumer Gurage; Quantity expression; Semantics; Syntax

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated how entities are conceptualized and quantified in the Gumer Variety of Gurage language. The linguistic means used to express quantity and how it interacts with nouns, verbs, and grammatical categories were examined. The study fills a gap in the research on Gurage and Ethiopian languages.
The aim of this study was to investigate how entities are conceptualized and quantified in the Gumer Variety of Gurage, a South Ethiosemitic language. It specifically uncovered the linguistic means used to express quantity and how the quantity expressions interact with a noun head in an NP, the predicate verb, and grammatical categories, such as gender, number, and definiteness. The topic is one of the marginalized areas as we do not find investigation on Gurage languages and most Ethiopian languages. We used a cross-sectional qualitative methodology and a semi-structured key informants interview method. We found that nouns in the Gumer Gurage are not inflected for a number morphologically; thus, bet house can be singular or plural. There are, however, lexically distinct plurals (әr ʧ boy and deng(j)a boys; әram a cow and әraj cows). Numerical quantifiers and definite articles are also used to show plurality. The language distinguishes count and mass nouns semantically but not structurally. The count nouns require measure words in addition to the numeral quantifier as in (sost sin k'awa [three cup coffee three cups of coffee]), but not *sost k'awa. Syntactically, a numeral quantifier precedes classifiers, and a head noun follows. A quantifier agrees in number and gender, when the noun is human, with nouns and verbs in a clause.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available