3.8 Article

A probabilistic semantics for modal QAD in standard Arabic

Journal

COGENT ARTS & HUMANITIES
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/23311983.2023.2241239

Keywords

epistemic Modality; Certainty; Possibility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This squib analyzes the modal use of the sentential particle qad in Standard Arabic, which only has certainty/likelihood modality meaning when it is composed with the tense expression of its propositional complement. Modal qad then manifests itself as an extreme, non-gradable modal with no lexically encoded but grammatically derived scale meaning. A probabilistic semantics is proposed to derive the truth conditions of the epistemic modal meaning of qad based on a monotonic, probabilistic time-world branching model. The analysis assigns a maximum degree of likelihood to qad in the past tense, which triggers certainty, and assigns a minimum degree of likelihoods to qad in the present tense, which triggers possibility.
Gradable Epistemic Modals (GEMs) such as certain or likely have been analyzed to have the semantics of gradable adjectives, which constrain their epistemic modality. This squib analyzes the modal use of the sentential particle qad in Standard Arabic which has the following puzzling behavior: particle qad gives rise to the certainty/likelihood modality meaning only when it is composed with the tense expression of its propositional complement. Modal qad then manifests itself as an extreme, non-gradable modal with no lexically encoded but grammatically derived scale meaning. A probabilistic semantics is proposed to derive the truth conditions of the epistemic modal meaning of qad based on a monotonic, probabilistic time-world branching model. The analysis assigns maximum degree of likelihood to qad in the past tense which triggers certainty. It also assigns a minimum degree of likelihoods to qad in the present tense which triggers possibility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available