3.8 Article

Petals of activism: Elucidating notions of feminism in the works of Helen Nzete

Journal

COGENT ARTS & HUMANITIES
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/23311983.2023.2247230

Keywords

art and feminism; Helen Nzete; art for activism; feminist art and the vulva; contemporary female artists; >

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines the works of Nigerian contemporary female artist Helen Nzete, who confronts patriarchal strongholds through her mixed-media creations. The paper analyzes her second solo exhibition titled V is for horizontal ellipsis, which tells the story of female existence without rights in African societies. It emphasizes the use of visual semiotic theory to deconstruct the symbolic paradigms in her works.
The ongoing patriarchal hegemony in African societies and other parts of the world has fostered diverse feminist reactions both verbally and visually. This paper considers the works of Helen Nzete, a contemporary female artist who employs her mixed-media creations in confronting the patriarchal strongholds of her society, Nigeria. Helen's second solo exhibition titled V is for horizontal ellipsis tells a story of the female existence without rights in African societies. Thus, she aligns her thoughts and agitations with several other female artists such as Zanele Muholi, and the Guerrilla Girls in protesting against the socio-political imbalance that exists in their societies. To properly understand the form, content and context of Helen's V is for horizontal ellipsis , this paper employs the visual semiotic theory as a tool to deconstruct the symbolic paradigms of the artist's works. The paper establishes that Helen's works were created as a form of feminist activism against unfair structures in society which promote the commodification, objectification and dehumanization of the female. Her works (re)present the woman as a figure of beauty, influence and power.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available