4.0 Article

Verifying the chronology of Ukrainian Neolithic

Journal

PRAEHISTORISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/pz-2022-2058

Keywords

Neolithic; Linear Pottery culture; Azov-Dnieper culture; chronology; Ukraine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper addresses the earliest Neolithic phases in Ukraine, focusing on the chronology, methods, and time of Neolithisation. The authors emphasize the importance of re-dating and validation in order to solve the problem. They compare the results from well-defined contexts in four sites with existing dates, concluding that the Kyiv dates should not be considered wrong. The authors also discuss the role of LBK and Azov-Dnieper culture in spreading farming and herding in Ukraine during the second half of the VIth millennium BC.
This paper addresses the earliest Neolithic phases in Ukraine: aspects relating to the chronology, methods and time of Neolithisation. In general, the earliest Neolithisation relates to the times of the Linear Pottery culture. Nevertheless, Ukraine has numerous eco-zones so the process could have been different in other zones. The authors emphasize that the key to getting closer to solving this problem is the chronology-re-dating and validation program. Hitherto dates of one culture or period of culture have been treated against each other. This article presents a small series of AMS from well-defined contexts of four sites, previously dated by the Kyiv radiocarbon facility. The results are compared with existing dates in order to establish the validity of existing chronologies for the Neolithic of Ukraine. Obtained results allowed the authors to conclude that the Kyiv dates should not be obligatorily treated as wrong. Furthermore, the authors reopened the discussion to establish what was the role of LBK and Azov-Dnieper culture communities in spreading farming and herding in Ukraine during the second half of the VIth millennium BC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available