4.7 Article

An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 125, Issue -, Pages 1063-1078

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.019

Keywords

Diffusion; Eddy current; Movement; Susceptibility; Registration

Funding

  1. NIH Human Connectome Project [1U54MH091657-01]
  2. EPSRC [EP/L023067/1]
  3. Wellcome-Trust Strategic Award [098369/Z/12/Z]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L023067/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/L023067/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Wellcome Trust [098369/Z/12/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper we describe a method for retrospective estimation and correction of eddy current (EC)-induced distortions and subject movement in diffusion imaging. In addition a susceptibility-induced field can be supplied and will be incorporated into the calculations in a way that accurately reflects that the two fields (susceptibility- and EC-induced) behave differently in the presence of subject movement. The method is based on registering the individual volumes to a model free prediction of what each volume should look like, thereby enabling its use on high b-value data where the contrast is vastly different in different volumes. In addition we show that the linear EC-model commonly used is insufficient for the data used in the present paper (high spatial and angular resolution data acquired with Stejskal-Tanner gradients on a 3 T Siemens Verio, a 3 T Siemens Connectome Skyra or a 7 T Siemens Magnetome scanner) and that a higher order model performs significantly better. The method is already in extensive practical use and is used by four major projects (the WU-UMinn HCP, the MGH HCP, the UK Biobank and theWhitehall studies) to correct for distortions and subject movement. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available