4.4 Review

The Insertion and Management of External Ventricular Drains: An Evidence-Based Consensus Statement

Journal

NEUROCRITICAL CARE
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 61-81

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12028-015-0224-8

Keywords

EVD; External ventricular drain; Ventriculostomy; Ventriculostomy-related infection; Ventriculostomy associated infection; VAI; VRI; Hydrocephalus; ICP; Monitoring; CSF drainage; Hemorrhage; Antibiotics; Antibiotic coated catheter; Antimicrobial coated catheter; Antibiotic prophylaxis; DVT; Deep venous thrombosis; DVT prophylaxis; Thromboembolism; Intraventricular antibiotics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

External ventricular drains (EVDs) are commonly placed to monitor intracranial pressure and manage acute hydrocephalus in patients with a variety of intracranial pathologies. The indications for EVD insertion and their efficacy in the management of these various conditions have been previously addressed in guidelines published by the Brain Trauma Foundation, American Heart Association and combined committees of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. While it is well recognized that placement of an EVD may be a lifesaving intervention, the benefits can be offset by procedural and catheter-related complications, such as hemorrhage along the catheter tract, catheter malposition, and CSF infection. Despite their widespread use, there are a lack of highquality data regarding the best methods for placement and management of EVDs to minimize these risks. Existing recommendations are frequently based on observational data from a single center and may be biased to the authors' view. To address the need for a comprehensive set of evidence-based guidelines for EVD management, the Neurocritical Care Society organized a committee of experts in the fields of neurosurgery, neurology, neuroinfectious disease, critical care, pharmacotherapy, and nursing. The Committee generated clinical questions relevant to EVD placement and management. They developed recommendations based on a thorough literature review using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system, with emphasis placed not only on the quality of the evidence, but also on the balance of benefits versus risks, patient values and preferences, and resource considerations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available