4.5 Article

Nanotoxicity of Silver Nanoparticles to Red Blood Cells: Size Dependent Adsorption, Uptake, and Hemolytic Activity

Journal

CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 501-509

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/tx500479m

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21307105, 21035005]
  2. Doctoral Program Foundation of Higher Education of China [20115301120002]
  3. fund of Chongqing Fundamental and the Cultivation Plan of Chongqing Science & Technology Commission for 100 Outstanding Science and Technology Leading Talents

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Silver nanopartides (AgNPs) are increasingly being used as antimicrobial agents and drug carriers in biomedical fields. However, toxicological information on their effects on red blood cells (RBCs) and the High mechanisms involved remain sparse. In this article, we examined the size dependent nanotoxicity of AgNPs using three different characteristic sizes of 15 rim (AgNPs15), 50 rim (AgNPs50), and 100 nm (AgNP5100) against fish RBCs. Optical microscopy and transmission electron microscopy observations showed that AgNPs exhibited a size effect on their adsorption and uptake by RBCs. The middle sized AgNP550, compared with the smaller or bigger ones, showed the highest level of adsorption and uptake by the RBCs, suggesting an optimal size of rim for passive uptake by RBCs. The toxic effects Low determined based on the hemolysis, membrane injury, lipid peroxidation, and antioxidant enzyme production were fairly size and dose dependent. In particular, the smallest sized AgNPs15 displayed a greater ability to induce hernolysis and membrane damage than AgNPs50 and AgNPs100. Such cytotoxicity induced by AgNPs should be attributed to the direct interaction of the nanoparticle with the RBCs, resulting in the production of oxidative stress, membrane injury, and subsequently hemolysis. Overall, the results suggest that particle size is a critical factor influencing the interaction between AgNPs and the RBCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available