4.6 Article

Constructive algorithm for fully connected cascade feedforward neural networks

Journal

NEUROCOMPUTING
Volume 182, Issue -, Pages 154-164

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.12.003

Keywords

Constructive algorithm; Feedforward neural network; Cascade correlation network; Convergence; Orthogonal least squares

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61203099, 61225016, 61533002]
  2. Beijing Science and Technology Project [Z141100001414005]
  3. Hong Kong Scholar Program [XJ2013018]
  4. Beijing Nova Program [Z131104000413007]
  5. Beijing Municipal Education Commission Foundation [km201410005001, KZ201410005002]
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M550017, 2015M57091]
  7. Collaborative Innovation Program [ZH14000177]
  8. Program of Study Interiorly for University Key Teacher
  9. Shandong Province China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a novel constructive algorithm, named fast cascade neural network (FCNN), is proposed to design the fully connected cascade feedforward neural network (FCCFNN). First, a modified index, based on the orthogonal least square method, is derived to select new hidden units from candidate pools. Each hidden unit leads to the maximal reduction of the sum of squared errors. Secondly, the input weights and biases of hidden units are randomly generated and remain unchanged during the learning process. The weights, which connect the input and hidden units with the output units, are calculated after all necessary units have been added. Thirdly, the convergence of FCNN is guaranteed in theory. Finally, the performance of FCNN is evaluated on some artificial and real-world benchmark problems. Simulation results show that the proposed FCNN algorithm has better generalization performance and faster learning speed than some existing algorithms. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available