3.8 Editorial Material

Sus and Mus in Lucretius (De rerum natura 5.25), Vergil (Georgics 1.181), and Horace (Ars poetica 139)

Journal

CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY
Volume 118, Issue 4, Pages 536-542

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/726376

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This note argues that the use of satiric final-monosyllable animals in the works of Lucretius, Vergil, and Horace constitutes a tradition that deflates, makes explicit, and satirizes epic patterns.
This note argues that the Lucretian hexameter-final monosyllable Arcadius sus (5.25) stands at the beginning of a Roman hexameter tradition of satiric final-monosyllable animals, echoed by Vergil's exiguus mus at Georgics 1.181 and Horace's ridiculus mus at Ars poetica 139. Lucretius' sus, in context, deflates and deglamorizes the boarish Labor of Hercules; Vergil's mus makes the satiric subtext explicit, and playfully suggests that pest control is a Herculean task; Horace's mus folds the satiric epic pattern in on itself, by using it to satirize epic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available