4.0 Article

Exploring service users' and practitioners' priorities regarding outcomes of cognitive behavioural therapy for distressing voices: a thematic analysis

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2023.2269225

Keywords

Auditory hallucinations; voice hearing; cognitive behavioural therapy; outcomes; qualitative research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This qualitative study explores the outcomes of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for distressing voices. The findings suggest differences in the priorities of service users and practitioners regarding changes in voice characteristics, understanding and managing emotions, and personal outcomes.
BackgroundThe outcomes of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for distressing voices and their measurement have mostly been determined by professionals, with little focus on the outcomes that matter to people who hear voices. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore views about the outcomes of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for distressing voices from the perspectives of lived and professional experience.MethodsFifteen service users and fourteen practitioners were recruited from mental health services. Semi-structured interview schedules were used to guide individual interviews with service users and focus groups with practitioners. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was applied to generate themes.ResultsFour themes were identified: I want what I can't have, Feeling empowered, Understanding and managing my emotions, and Doing more of what I want to do. Two themes contained sub-themes.DiscussionValued outcomes by service users and practitioners appeared to reflect changes in voice characteristics, improvements in self-confidence and self-respect, acceptance of voices, understanding and managing emotions and personal outcomes. Findings suggest discrepancies between service users' and practitioners' priorities in regard to changes in voice characteristics and understanding and managing negative emotions. Recommendations include a greater focus on managing emotions by practitioners.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available