4.5 Article

Protective Effect of Hyperbaric Oxygen on Cognitive Impairment Induced by d-Galactose in Mice

Journal

NEUROCHEMICAL RESEARCH
Volume 41, Issue 11, Pages 3032-3041

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11064-016-2022-x

Keywords

Hyperbaric oxygen; D-Galactose; Cognitive impairment; Gene

Funding

  1. Guangxi Sanitation and Family Planning Committee Project [Z2016582]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Memory decline is characteristic of aging and age-related neurodegenerative disorders. This study was designed to investigate the protective effect of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) against cognitive impairment induced by d-galactose (d-gal) in mice. d-gal was intraperitoneally injected into mice daily for 8 weeks to establish the aging model. HBO was simultaneously administered once daily. The results indicate that HBO significantly reversed D-gal-induced learning and memory impairments. Studies on the potential mechanisms of this action showed that HBO significantly reduced oxidative stress by increasing superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, and catalase levels, as well as the total anti-oxidation capability, while decreasing the content of malondialdehyde, nitric oxide, and nitric oxide synthase in the hippocampal CA1 region. HBO also inhibited advanced glycation end-product formation and decreased levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6. Moreover, HBO significantly attenuated d-gal-induced pathological injury in the hippocampus, as well as beta-amyloid protein(1-42) expression and retained BDNF expression. Furthermore, HBO decreased p16, p21 and p53 gene and protein expression in the hippocampus of d-gal-treated mice. In conclusion, the protective effect of HBO against d-gal-induced cognitive impairment was mainly due to its ability to reduce oxidative damage, suppress inflammatory responses, and regulate aging-related gene expression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available