Journal
JOURNAL OF WRIST SURGERY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771010
Keywords
TFCC; triangular fibrocartilage; PROM; surgery; open reinsertion; outcome; prognostic factors
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The purpose of this study was to determine thresholds in patient-reported outcome measures at baseline for selecting patients with clinically improved outcomes in triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) surgery. The study found that a PRWE total score at baseline <34 is a strong signal to reconsider open surgery of the TFCC because the chance of reaching a clinically meaningful outcome is slim.
Purpose To determine thresholds in patient-reported outcome measures at baseline in patients electing to undergo triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) surgery to select patients with clinically improved outcomes.Methods The study cohort comprised consecutive patients who underwent open TFCC repair between December 2011 and December 2018 in various clinics in the Netherlands. All patients were asked to complete the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire at baseline as well as at 12 months postoperatively. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the PRWE was calculated to be 24 using an anchor-based method. We compared patient, disease, and surgical characteristics between patients who did and did not reach the MCID. The t-tests and chi-square tests were undertaken to test differences between outcomes and satisfaction in patients who did or did not reach the MCID.Results Patients (34%) who did not reach MCID had a longer history of complaints. The chances of reaching the MCID for patients with a low PRWE score at baseline were slim. Of patients with a PRWE score <34 at baseline, only 14% reached the MCID, whereas in patients with a PRWE score of >34, 69% reached the MCID.Conclusion A PRWE total score at baseline <34 is a strong signal to reconsider open surgery of the TFCC because the chance of reaching a clinically meaningful outcome is slim.Level of Evidence II.Type of Study Therapeutic.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available