3.8 Review

A review of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis regression

Journal

JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages 189-195

Publisher

KOREAN SOC PATHOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4132/jptm.2023.05.24

Keywords

Liver; Cirrhosis; Fibrosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cirrhosis has traditionally been considered an irreversible end-stage liver disease. However, new treatments have shown that fibrosis and cirrhosis can regress, improving clinical parameters and survival rates, indicating a bidirectional dynamic process.
Cirrhosis has traditionally been considered an irreversible process of end-stage liver disease. With new treatments for chronic liver disease, there is regression of fibrosis and cirrhosis, improvement in clinical parameters (i.e. liver function and hemodynamic markers, hepatic venous pressure gradient), and survival rates, demonstrating that fibrosis and fibrolysis are a dynamic process moving in two directions. Microscopically, hepatocytes push into thinning fibrous septa with eventual perforation leaving behind delicate periportal spikes in the portal tracts and loss of portal veins. Obliterated portal veins during progressive fibrosis and cirrhosis due to parenchymal extinction, vascular remodeling and thrombosis often leave behind a bile duct and hepatic artery within the portal tract. Traditional staging classification systems focused on a linear, progressive process; however, the Beijing classification system incorporates both the bidirectional nature for the progression and regression of fibrosis. However, even with regression, vascular lesions/remodeling, parenchymal extinction and a cumulative mutational burden place patients at an increased risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma and should continue to undergo active clinical surveillance. It is more appropriate to consider cirrhosis as another stage in the evolution of chronic liver disease as a bidirectional process rather than an end-stage, irreversible state.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available