3.8 Article

Prevalence of truancy among school-going adolescents in three South Asian countries: association with potential risk and protective factors

Journal

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02673843.2023.2242480

Keywords

Truancy; Bangladesh; Afghanistan; Pakistan; Adolescents; Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS); >

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using data from the Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS), researchers analyzed 7562 adolescent data from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan to examine the prevalence and associated factors of school truancy among adolescents. The prevalence of school truancy was 26.6%, with the highest rates in Bangladesh (37%), followed by Pakistan (24.7%), and Afghanistan (14.7%). Male adolescents had a higher risk of truancy than female respondents, and factors such as age, bullying, injuries, and household food insecurity also increased the risk.
We examined the prevalence and evaluated the associated risk and protective factors of adolescent school truancy through sex-stratified models by analysing 7562 adolescent data from the Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS) of three South Asian countries: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. The prevalence of school truancy was 26.6%. The highest truancy was found in Bangladesh (37%), followed by Pakistan (24.7%) and Afghanistan (14.7%). Male adolescents had a 2.05 times higher relative risk ratio (RRR) [95% CI: 1.29, 3.28] of having truancy of & GE; 3 days (last month) than the female respondents. Respondents of older age, bullied, and injured had significantly higher RRR of truancy of & GE; 3 days than their counterparts. Household food insecurity also significantly increased male and female students' RRR of school truancy. However, peer and high parental support significantly reduced the RRR of 1-2 days and & GE; 3 days of truancy of male and female students.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available