4.5 Article

White matter hyperintensities and cognitive reserve during a working memory task: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in cognitively normal older adults

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 48, Issue -, Pages 23-33

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.08.008

Keywords

Aging; Cognitive reserve; fMRI; Compensation; Neural efficiency; White matter hyperintensities; Education; Working memory

Funding

  1. Doctoral College Imaging the Mind of the Austrian Science Foundation [FWF-W1233]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [PSI2015-64227-R]
  3. Walnuts and Healthy Aging (WAHA) - California Walnut Commission, Sacramento, California, USA [NCT01634841]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cognitive reserve (CR) models posit that lifestyle factors such as education modulate the relationship between brain damage and cognition. However, the functional correlates of CR in healthy aging are still under investigation. White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are a common age-associated finding that impacts cognition. In this study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to characterize the patterns of brain activation during a working memory task in older participants with high and low levels of education (as a proxy of CR) and high and low WMH volumes. Ninety older volunteers (aged 63-76 years) and 16 young adults (aged 21-27) completed the study. We found that older adults with higher education had better working memory performance than their less educated peers. Among the highly educated participants, those with WMH over-recruited areas engaged by young volunteers and showed activation in additional cortical and subcortical structures. However, those with low WMH differed little with respect to their younger counterparts. Our findings demonstrate that the functional mechanisms subtending the effects of education, as a proxy of CR, are modulated according to the WMH burden. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available