4.2 Article

Intellectual activism and pivotal paradigms in casting the model woman of the early Turkish Republic: the voices of Şükûfe Nihal and Nezihe Muhittin

Journal

TURKISH STUDIES
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 121-144

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2023.2262089

Keywords

Women's history; early Turkish Republic; modernization; ideal woman; feminism

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Feminist historiography on the late Ottoman and early Turkish Republican era often portrays female women's rights advocates as mere activists or literary figures, neglecting their intellectual nature. However, this article presents a novel perspective, arguing that two prominent figures, Sukufe Nihal and Nezihe Muhittin, were genuine intellectuals whose views on feminism, gender equality, and womanhood were influenced by Enlightenment thought, positivism, and nationalism.
Feminist historiography on the late Ottoman and early Turkish Republican era treats female women's rights advocates typically as merely activists or literary figures and rarely focuses on their intellectual property, which constitutes the origin of their theoretical contribution to and active struggle for women's equality. The academic corpus on the two prominent figures of the era, Sukufe Nihal and Nezihe Muhittin, follows this pattern and concentrates predominantly on their literary works or activism, leaving their intellectualism overshadowed. This article employs an innovative perspective and argues that they were genuine intellectuals first. The article uncovers the intellectual lenses behind their discourses and claims their views were embedded in the premises of Enlightenment thought, positivism and nationalism, which constituted the building blocks of their paradigms on feminism, gender equality and womanhood. Unearthing their ideal woman image in the early Turkish Republic rests on the methods of contextual deconstruction and textual analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available