4.2 Article

Evaluating the technical efficiency of Saudi Arabian telecommunications companies using window DEA and AHP techniques

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IMEFM-02-2023-0043

Keywords

Technical efficiency; Telecommunications industry; Window data envelopment analysis; Analytical hierarchy process

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of three telecommunications companies in Saudi Arabia using three multicriteria decision-making techniques. The results show that Saudi Telecom Company (STC) ranked first in all three techniques, followed by Zain and then Mobily. These companies were efficient only in 2012 according to the DEA window analysis. The efficiency was high in the initial years, 2010-2013, but dropped in the subsequent years, 2014-2019. STC maintained a high average efficiency of 0.990, while Zain and Mobily had average efficiencies of 0.807 and 0.804, respectively.
PurposeThis study aims to evaluate the efficiency of the three telecommunications companies in Saudi Arabia: Saudi Telecom Company (STC), Mobily and Zain over the period of 2010-2019. This evaluation is a step toward improving the performance of the Saudi telecommunications sector.Design/methodology/approachThree multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques were used to calculate technical efficiency. These techniques include the traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA), window DEA and analytical hierarchy process (AHP). The three inputs used were total assets, operating expenses and capital expenditures, whereas the two outputs were sales revenue and total stockholders' equity.FindingsSTC was ranked first using the three techniques, followed by Zain, and then Mobily. According to the DEA window analysis, these three companies were all efficient only in 2012. The efficiency was high in the initial years, 2010-2013, when it was above 0.90, and it dropped below 0.90 in the subsequent years, 2014-2019. In addition, the efficiency of STC remained high, with an average of 0.990. However, the average efficiencies of Zain and Mobily during this period were 0.807 and 0.804, respectively.Originality/valueThis is the first study to use the three MCDM techniques to evaluate the performance of telecommunications providers. The results show that window DEA is better than the other two techniques at evaluating performance over time, as it has a higher discrimination power than either the traditional DEA or AHP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available