4.3 Article

Digital methods in memory studies: A beginner's guide to scalable reading of Twitter data

Journal

MEMORY STUDIES
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/17506980231197126

Keywords

digital memory; digital methods; scalable reading; Sesame Street; Twitter

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article contributes methodologically to the field of digital memory studies by demonstrating a possible approach for memory studies scholars to use digital methods while remaining connected to traditional research. It showcases an analytical workflow for reading large quantities of tweets using the Twitter API and argues that this combination can greatly enhance data collection and analysis practices in memory studies. The article also shows how the Twitter API enables systematic and large-scale tweet collection, reducing dependence on the algorithmic bias of the platform's regular interface.
This article makes a methodological contribution to the growing subfield of digital memory studies. It demonstrates a possible way forward for memory studies scholars who want to try out digital methods but also remain in conversation with the kinds of research traditionally produced within the field. The article revolves around a showcase of an analytical workflow for conducting a scalable reading of large quantities of tweets through access to the Twitter API. The article argues that using only basic computational approaches to social media data in combination with API access can drastically improve data collection practices and enrich analytical practices, producing results recognizable and compatible with existing research in memory studies. As a case study, the article uses a dataset of nearly 200,000 tweets collected around two events that prompted Twitter users to discuss the history of the American children's television program Sesame Street. It does so to demonstrate: first, how a visualization focusing on chronology can help underpin arguments about heightened activity around certain events. Second, a close reading of selected tweets from these events can support claims of shared activity, even if no hashtags were used. And third, how using simple tools for distant reading makes it possible to converse with questions and issues about gatekeepers and connectivity already central within memory studies. Furthermore, the article demonstrates how the Twitter API supports a more systematical, large-scale collection of tweets than usually seen in memory studies, making researchers less dependent on the algorithmic bias that rules the search in the platform's regular interface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available