4.0 Article

Validation of dysphagia perception to predict the risk for dysphagia in non-institutionalized older adults

Journal

CLINICAL NUTRITION ESPEN
Volume 57, Issue -, Pages 358-363

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.07.014

Keywords

Aged; Deglutition disorders; Deglutition; Elderly nutrition; Validation study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the validity of self-perceived dysphagia in community-dwelling older adults. The results showed that the risk of dysphagia according to the Eating Assessment Tool was 12.9% and the self-perception of dysphagia was 8.8%. Due to the low sensitivity and positive predictive value, caution should be exercised in using a single question to analyze self-perceived dysphagia.
Background and aims: Dysphagia is a swallowing disorder that affects mainly the older adults and can compromise quality of life, and increase the risk for malnutrition and aspiration. Early diagnosis is, therefore, essential to prevent adversities. We aimed to evaluate the validity of self-perceived dysphagia in community-dwelling older adults (60 years or older) from Pelotas, Brazil, participants in the COMO VAI? study.Methods: The Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) was used as the reference tool to identify the risk for dysphagia and the self-perception of dysphagia was assessed using the following question: Do you have swallowing difficulties? (Yes/No). The parameters of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were described with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and according to independent variables (sex, age, economic level, and education).Results: The prevalence of dysphagia risk according to EAT-10 and self-perception was 12.9% (95% CI 10.2 -16.1) and 8.8% (95% CI 6.6-11.6), respectively. Sensitivity was 34.8% (95% CI 23.5-47.6) and the highest values were observed in women and the older individuals (80 years or older). Specificity was 95.1% (95% CI 92.6-96.9). PPV was 51.1% (95% CI 35.8-66.3), NPV 90.8% (95% CI 87.8-93.2) and accuracy 87.3%.Conclusions: Considering the low sensitivity and PPV, the self-perception of dysphagia analyzed with a single question should be used with caution, as an individual at risk for dysphagia may not realize their condition.& COPY; 2023 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available