4.5 Article

Environmental productivity assessment: An illustration with the Ecuadorian oil industry

Journal

MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/mde.3970

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines the performance of 20 Ecuadorian petroleum companies from 2014 to 2018 by using pollution-adjusted Malmquist (PM) and Hicks-Moorsteen (PHM) productivity indices within a convex neutral analytical framework. It is the first study to investigate the environmental performance variation of the Ecuadorian oil industry. Unlike previous research, which assumed convexity in the production process, this paper considers possible non-linearities. The PM and PHM indices used in this paper are decomposed to identify the key drivers of economic and pollution-related productivity changes. The assessment of performance change is conducted through a nonparametric enumerative method.
This paper assesses the performance of 20 Ecuadorian petroleum industry over the period 2014-2018, using the pollution-adjusted Malmquist (PM) and Hicks-Moorsteen (PHM) productivity indices within a convex neutral analytical framework. Indeed, to the best of our knowledge, the environmental performance variation of the Ecuadorian oil industry has never been investigated hitherto in the literature. Moreover, the existing literature that analyses the environmental performance change of oil industries applied the Malmquist productivity index by considering a convex production set. However, the convexity assumption results in ignoring possible non-linearities in the production process. Also, the performed PM and PHM in this paper are decomposed and disaggregated to provide the main drivers of both economic and polluting productivity change. Finally, the performance change assessment is carried out through a nonparametric enumerative method that is defined in the paper.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available