4.6 Article

A novel bioactive nerve conduit for the repair of peripheral nerve injury

Journal

NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 150-155

Publisher

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.175062

Keywords

nerve regeneration; polylactic acid; poly{(lacticacid)-co-[(glycolic acid)-alt-(L-lysine)]}; beta-tricalcium phosphate; nerve conduit; nerve fiber; neural regeneration

Funding

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2011CB606205]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51403168]
  3. Major Scientific and Technological Research Projects of the Ministry of Education of China [313041]
  4. Scientific and Technological Cooperation Project of Hong Kong, China [2015DFH30180]
  5. Scientific and Technological Cooperation Project of Macao, China [2015DFH30180]
  6. Scientific and Technological Cooperation Project of Taiwan, China [2015DFH30180]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of a nerve conduit provides an opportunity to regulate cytokines, growth factors and neurotrophins in peripheral nerve regeneration and avoid autograft defects. We constructed a poly-D-L-lactide (PDLLA)-based nerve conduit that was modified using poly{(lactic acid)-co-[(glycolic acid)-alt-(L-lysine)]} and beta-tricalcium phosphate. The effectiveness of this bioactive PDLLA-based nerve conduit was compared to that of PDLLA-only conduit in the nerve regeneration following a 10-mm sciatic nerve injury in rats. We observed the nerve morphology in the early period of regeneration, 35 days post injury, using hematoxylin-eosin and methylene blue staining. Compared with the PDLLA conduit, the nerve fibers in the PDLLA-based bioactive nerve conduit were thicker and more regular in size. Muscle fibers in the soleus muscle had greater diameters in the PDLLA bioactive group than in the PDLLA only group. The PDLLA-based bioactive nerve conduit is a promising strategy for repair after sciatic nerve injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available