4.4 Article

Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) for Depersonalization Derealization Disorder (DDD): a self-controlled cross-over study of waiting list vs. active treatment

Journal

COGNITIVE BEHAVIOUR THERAPY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2023.2255744

Keywords

Depersonalisation; derealisation; dissociation; CBT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reports on a clinical audit of 36 participants with chronic DDD who completed Cognitive Behavioural Therapy adapted for DDD. The results showed improvement in all scores during the treatment period, suggesting that CBT may be an effective treatment for DDD. However, more research is needed to assess its efficacy.
Depersonalisation-Derealisation Disorder (DDD) has a prevalence of around 1% but is under-recognised and often does not respond to medical intervention. We report on a clinical audit of 36 participants with a diagnosis of chronic DDD who were sequentially recruited from a specialist DDD National Health Service clinic in London, United Kingdom, and who completed Cognitive Behavioural Therapy specifically adapted for DDD. The sample population had a mean age of 38.7 years (s.d. = 13.4), 61% were male and 69% were of White ethnicity. Three outcomes were assessed (Cambridge Depersonalisation Scale [CDS], Beck Depression Inventory [BDI], and the Beck Anxiety Inventory [BAI]) at three time points in a naturalistic, self-controlled, cross-over design. Hierarchical longitudinal analyses for outcome response clustered by patient were performed using scores from baseline, beginning, and end of therapy. All scores showed improvement during the treatment period, with medium effect sizes. CBT may be an effective treatment for DDD. However, treatment was not randomly assigned, and the sample was small. More research is needed, including the use of randomisation to assess the efficacy of CBT for DDD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available