3.8 Review

Conceptualizing Interprofessional Digital Communication and Collaboration in Health Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Journal

JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC
DOI: 10.2196/45179

Keywords

digital technologies; interdisciplinary communication; intersectoral collaboration; nurse; physician; collaboration; interdisciplinary; scoping review; communication; interprofessional

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This proposed scoping review aims to identify the key factors influencing the development, implementation, and adoption of digital tools for interprofessional communication in the healthcare sector. It also aims to analyze and synthesize the definitions, dimensions, and concepts of digitally supported communication and collaboration among healthcare professionals. By conducting an in-depth analysis using various databases, this study will provide a summary of the characteristics of digital communication and collaboration in healthcare and nursing, and contribute to the establishment of digitally supported collaborations and the development of digital frameworks.
Background: Effective communication and collaboration among health professionals are essential prerequisites for patient-centered care. However, interprofessional teams require suitable structures and tools to efficiently use their professional competencies in the service of high-quality care appropriate to the patient's life situation. In this context, digital tools potentially enhance interprofessional communication and collaboration and lead to an organizationally, socially, and ecologically sustainable health care system. However, there is a lack of studies systematically assessing the critical factors for successfully implementing tools for digitally supported interprofessional communication and collaboration in the health care setting. Furthermore, an operationalization of this concept is missing. Objective: The aim of the proposed scoping review is to (1) identify factors influencing the development, implementation, and adoption processes of digital tools for interprofessional communication in the health care sector and (2) analyze and synthesize the (implicit) definition, dimensions, and concepts of digitally supported communication and collaboration among health care professionals in the health care setting. Studies focusing on digital communication and collaboration practices among health care professionals, including medical doctors and qualified medical assistants, in any health care setting will be included in this review. Methods: To address these objectives, an in-depth analysis of heterogeneous studies is needed, which is best achieved through a scoping review. Within this proposed scoping review, which adheres to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, 5 databases (SCOPUS, CINAHL, PubMed, Embase, and PsycInfo) will be searched for studies assessing digital communication and collaboration among various health care professionals in different health care settings. Studies focusing on health care providers or patient interaction through digital tools and non-peer-reviewed studies will be excluded. Results: Key characteristics of the studies included will be summarized through descriptive analysis, using diagrams and tables. We will synthesize and map the data and conduct a qualitative in-depth thematic analysis of definitions and dimensions of interprofessional digital communication and collaboration among health care and nursing professionals. Conclusions: Results from this scoping review may help in establishing digitally supported collaborations between various stakeholders in the health care setting and successfully implementing new forms of interprofessional communication and collaboration. This could facilitate the transition to better coordinated care and encourage the development of digital frameworks. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/45179

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available