4.5 Review

Students' feedback seeking behaviour in undegraduate education: A scoping review

Journal

EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW
Volume 40, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100549

Keywords

Feedback; Feedback seeking behaviour; Motivation; Feedback literacy; Scoping review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This scoping review aims to develop a comprehensive understanding of students' feedback seeking strategies and motivations, and related antecedents and outcomes in undergraduate education. The key findings discuss the various motives and strategies for feedback seeking, as well as the potential for feedback seeking outcomes to relate to high achievement. The implications for practice highlight the importance of training and supporting student feedback seeking in psychologically safe learning environments.
Feedback seeking in the organisational field has attracted sustained attention but seems relatively under-exploited in higher education. This scoping review aims to synthesize empirical research on feedback seeking in undergraduate education to develop a comprehensive understanding of students' feedback seeking strategies and motivations, and related antecedents and outcomes. The method involved consultations with an expert panel, and a scoping review of 42 studies identified through rigorous search procedures. The key findings discuss learning enhancement, impression management and ego-based motives for feedback seeking; direct inquiry, indirect inquiry and monitoring strategies; and potential for feedback seeking outcomes to relate to high achievement. Broader implications focus on the interdependence between feedback seeking and feedback literacy; and the potential for cross-fertilisation of insights between research in organisations, medical education and broader higher education. Implications for practice focus on training and supporting student feedback seeking within psychologically safe learning environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available