4.5 Article

A Qualitative Study of VA Entrants' Experiences Discussing Community Care With Veterans

Journal

SAGE OPEN
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/21582440231204666

Keywords

health care quality; access; and evaluation; Veteran's health services; qualitative research; policy; decision making

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted interviews with clinicians and staff to evaluate their experiences with Veterans' decisions on healthcare and identify areas for improvement. Insufficient time and knowledge were found to be barriers to assisting Veterans in making decisions about community care. Concerns about quality of community care and lack of patient understanding also emerged. Clinicians need decision support that integrates informational needs, referral process clarity, and improved quality measurement and description methods. While new initiatives have been established, the rollout is complex and ongoing.
We conducted interviews with clinicians and staff involved in Veterans' decisions about where to receive their health care to assess experiences with community care coordination and identify areas for improvement. Insufficient time and knowledge were cited as barriers to assisting Veterans in making decisions about whether to use community care resources. Concerns regarding quality of community care and lack of patient understanding on the implications of accessing community care also arose. Clinicians need to be able to help Veterans make informed choices about where to receive their health care and may require decision support that integrates their informational needs with their values and preferences, clarity on the referral process, and improved ways to measure and describe quality of care to Veterans. VA has recognized issues with community care and established new initiatives but the rollout is complex and ongoing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available