4.5 Article

The Influence of Internship Year on Nursing Students' Perceived Clinical Competence: A Multi-Site Study

Journal

SAGE OPEN
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/21582440231193198

Keywords

clinical competence; internship; nursing; students; nursing practice

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to examine the perceived clinical competence among undergraduate nursing students in Saudi Arabia. The results showed that internship students had a higher level of clinical competence compared to fourth year students. The study also found that education year and gender were significant predictors of perceived clinical competence level.
This study aimed to explore the level of perceived clinical competence among undergraduate nursing students. This was a cross-sectional, comparative, study. Data were collected using the Clinical Competence Questionnaire. Study participants included fourth year and internship nursing students attending 1 of 39 public and private nursing programs in Saudi Arabia. A total of 244 nursing students completed the clinical competence questionnaire. Students reported the ability to perform some clinical skills in clinical settings under supervision. Intern students had higher clinical competence than fourth year students (t = 2.792, p < .01). Year of education (beta = .148, p < .05) and gender (beta =.190, p < .01) were statistically significant to the prediction of perceived clinical competence level. The internship year facilitates the translation of theory into practice, which eventually may improve students' clinical competence skills. Improving perceived clinical competencies might improve actual clinical competencies. Lastly, more qualitative research studies are needed to investigate the decreased perceived clinical competencies among male students compared female students.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available