4.7 Article

Sustainable development according to 2030 agenda in European Union countries: Evidence of the enlargement policy

Journal

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sd.2758

Keywords

2030 agenda; EU countries; EU enlargement process; GIS; multi-criteria analysis; sustainable development goals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study uses the assessment framework based on the 2030 Agenda to evaluate the performance of European Union countries in achieving sustainable development. By applying the Spatial Sustainability Assessment Model, which combines multi-criteria analysis with the geographical tool QuantumGIS, European countries are classified according to the four basic dimensions of sustainability (social, economic, environmental, and institutional) with reference to the year 2020. The results show that Northern countries have better overall sustainability performance in all dimensions except the environment. On the other hand, Eastern European and Mediterranean countries perform worse, especially in the economic and institutional dimensions, with a gap between post-2004 EU member states and other countries.
This paper assesses the performance of European Union countries in achieving sustainable development using an assessment framework based on the 2030 Agenda. Through the application of the Spatial Sustainability Assessment Model, which integrates multi-criteria analysis with the geographical tool QuantumGIS, European countries are classified according to the four basic dimensions of sustainability (social, economic, environmental, and institutional) organized into various sub-dimensions, with reference to the year 2020. The results show that Northern countries have better overall sustainability performance in all dimensions except the environment. In contrast, Eastern European and Mediterranean countries perform worse, showing major weaknesses, especially in the economic and institutional dimensions, with a gap between the countries that joined the Union after 2004 and the other states. An in-depth analysis was conducted to highlight the reasons behind these difficulties in order to give useful indications to public decision-makers, as a tool for planning, on future choices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available