4.1 Article

A brief CBT intervention for depersonalisation-derealisation disorder in psychosis: Results from a feasibility randomised controlled trial

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101911

Keywords

Depersonalisation; Derealisation; Dissociation psychosis; Psychological therapy; Trial; Feasibility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a six-session therapy protocol adapted from a Cognitive-Behavioural model of Depersonalisation-Derealisation Disorder (DDD) in individuals with psychotic symptoms. The results suggest that the intervention was feasible and acceptable to participants, with some indication of its effectiveness on clinical outcomes.
Background and objectives: Depersonalisation/derealisation symptoms are prevalent in psychosis patients, are associated with increased impairment, and may maintain psychosis symptoms. We aimed to establish the feasibility and acceptability of a brief, six session therapy protocol adapted from a Cognitive-Behavioural model of Depersonalisation-Derealisation Disorder (DDD) in participants with psychotic symptoms. Methods: A single-blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted with a treatment-as-usual control condition. Feasibility and acceptability estimates included rates of referral, acceptance, eligibility, consent, satisfaction and improved skills/knowledge to manage depersonalisation. Results: Twenty-one individuals were recruited to the trial. Results suggest that the intervention was feasible and acceptable to participants and there is some signal of effect on clinical outcomes. Limitations: There were some challenges in recruitment. Recruitment feasibility estimates from the research register used may not be informative for future trials recruiting directly from teams. Conclusions: Overall, the results suggest that further investigations would be of interest and recommendations for this are made.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available