4.7 Article

Are female teachers more likely to practice grade inflation? Evidence from China

Journal

CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW
Volume 80, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2023.101987

Keywords

Female teachers; Grade inflation; Educational inequality; China

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines whether high grades accompanying with the growth of female teachers arise from student improvement or grade inflation. The results show that high grades do not result from student progress but from grade inflation. Female teachers practice grade inflation for different students, and the effect is more pronounced among female students, low-ability students, and students in senior grades. The adoption of high-grades practice by female teachers may be influenced by potential pressures under discrimination and uncertainty rather than for the sake of course or students.
Grade inflation has become a global phenomenon that raises concerns in the academia and the public. This study examines whether high grades accompanying with the growth of female teachers arise from student improvement or grade inflation. We use randomly assigned samples from the China Education Panel Survey and obtain the following results. (1) Students taught by female teachers obtain 1.57 grades point higher compared with those taught by male teachers. High grades do not result from student progress but from grade inflation. (2) Female teachers practice grade inflation for different students, and the effect is more pronounced among female students, low-ability students, and students in senior grades. (3) Female teachers may adopt a high-grades practice due to potential pressures under discrimination and uncertainty rather than for the sake of course or students. (4) Last, high grades brought by female teachers lead to less effort for students in the second year. This paper not only provides data support for understanding the increasing grade inflation, but also offers clear implications for the improvement of evaluation systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available