4.3 Article

The State- and Trait-Level Effects and Candidate Mechanisms of Four Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) Practices: Two Exploratory Studies

Journal

MINDFULNESS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12671-023-02193-6

Keywords

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy; MBCT; Mindfulness practice; Mechanisms

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The primary aim of this study was to explore the effects and potential mechanisms of four Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) practices at both state and trait levels. One hundred sixty adults were randomly assigned to one of four mindfulness practices and the results showed state-level effects in various mechanisms and outcomes, except for state decentering. However, after controlling for pre-scores and additional covariates, no significant between-group effects were found. Trait-level effects were demonstrated in psychological quality of life and most mechanisms, but no between-group effects were found. Changes in mindfulness, self-compassion, decentering, and interoceptive awareness were associated with improvements in psychological quality of life.
ObjectivesThe primary aim was to explore state- and trait-level effects and candidate mechanisms of four Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) practices.MethodOne hundred sixty adults self-selected from the general population were randomized to one of four mindfulness practices: body scan, mindful movement, breath and body, and befriending. Study 1 explored state-level self-compassion, mindfulness, decentering (mechanisms), and pleasantness of thoughts, emotions, and body sensations at multiple time points using two single mindfulness sessions. Study 2 explored trait-level self-compassion, mindfulness, decentering, interoceptive awareness, attentional control (mechanisms), anxiety, depression, and psychological quality of life pre-post 2 weeks of daily practice.ResultsIn study 1, state-level effects were demonstrated in all candidate mechanisms and outcomes within the whole sample across time points (d = 0.27 to 0.86), except for state decentering. After controlling for pre-scores and additional covariates, no between-group effects were found (p = 0.050 to 0.973). In study 2, trait-level effects were demonstrated in psychological quality of life and most candidate mechanisms within the whole sample (d = 0.26 to 0.64) but no between-group effects were found (p = 0.080 to 0.805). Within the whole sample, after controlling for pre-scores, changes in mindfulness, self-compassion, decentering, and interoceptive awareness (i.e. body listening) were associated with improvements in psychological quality of life (r = 0.23 to 0.40) and self-led mindfulness practice (r = 0.18 to 0.23).ConclusionsFuture research should test the generated hypotheses using well-designed, adequately powered, and theory-driven studies that address universal and specific mechanisms in different populations and contexts.Pre-registrationThis study is not pre-registered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available