4.7 Article

What kind of fiscal policies and natural resources efficiency promotes green economic growth? Evidence from regression analysis

Journal

RESOURCES POLICY
Volume 85, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103941

Keywords

Economic growth; Resource management; Autoregressive distributed lag; Environmental rents

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzes how government spending and natural resource efficiency have influenced green economic development in China from 1990 to 2020 using the PMG-ARDL model. The findings demonstrate the significant correlation between green economic development and fiscal policy interventions as well as natural resource efficiency measures, highlighting the effectiveness of certain fiscal policies and resource management practices in promoting sustainable development and mitigating the environmental impact of economic activities in China.
The promotion of green economic development and sustainability has received increasing attention throughout the world in recent years. Regarding global emission reduction efforts, China plays a pivotal role as one of the world's biggest economies and a significant player. Using the Pooled Mean Group Autoregressive Distributed Lag (PMG-ARDL) model, analyzes how government spending and natural resource efficiency have affected green economic development in China from 1990 to 2020. We conduct a regression study to understand better how fiscal policy measures and indices of natural resource efficiency might work together to foster environmentally responsible economic development. The findings show that green economic development is significantly correlated with key interventions in fiscal policy and natural resource efficiency measures. These results light the efficacy of certain fiscal policies and resource management practices in promoting sustainable development and mitigating the environmental impact of economic activities in China.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available